The consequences of the Spain quarantine measures for families planning a foreign break are widely covered in Monday’s papers – and make the lead for many.
“Holidays in turmoil as quarantine is imposed”, is the headline in the Times. It says hundreds of thousands of people have been rushing to cancel foreign holidays – particularly to France, Italy and Greece – fearing that restrictions could be imposed on other countries with little or no warning.
An analysis by the Telegraph suggests that most countries on the government’s list of “safe” holiday destinations have, like Spain, seen Covid-19 incidence rates rise sharply in the past week.
The Mirror sums up the situation facing holidaymakers with the headline: “Summer in tatters”.
There is sympathy for families who have booked what the Mail calls sanity-restoring post-lockdown breaks in Spain – and now face the prospect of having to quarantine on their return home or cancelling their trips.
The i says the changing plans will be another kick in the teeth after months of hardship. But the papers are divided over whether the government was right to introduce the measure.
In the Sun’s view, you do not need a crystal ball to realise that in the long run, imposing quarantines at short notice will destroy travellers’ confidence.
The Telegraph thinks the decision was taken hastily and shows an inflexible approach to assessing risk. Given the number of Britons who have headed for Spain in good faith in recent days, was it not possible to differentiate between the areas where the infection is rising and those that are almost Covid-free? it asks.
However, for the Times the government has done the right thing. It says ministers have sustained criticism during the coronavirus crisis for acting too late. This time, it acted decisively on being presented with the evidence.
A picture of Boris Johnson burning off the calories by taking his dog, Dilyn, for a walk in the grounds of Chequers accompanies the Telegraph’s main story – the government’s new strategy for tackling obesity in England.
It highlights the suggestion by Health Secretary Matt Hancock that if everyone who is overweight lost five pounds, it could save the NHS more than £100m.
The Sun likes the idea of allowing doctors to prescribe cycling to help people to lose weight. But restricting chocolate sales is a depressing sop to the nanny state, and all the evidence suggests it will fail, it says.
The Mirror warns that Mr Johnson will not save the country from obesity until manufacturers are forced by law to reduce salt and calories in their food and drink.
What do the papers make of the new book about the Duke and Duchess of Sussex that is attracting widespread coverage?
In large parts – the Mail says – the book is little more than a self-aggrandising, self-pitying whinge by Prince Harry and Meghan. Even more distasteful – it goes on – it is a barely disguised exercise in grievance-settling against other royals.
The Telegraph says the couple deny collaborating with the authors, but since they are ready to take legal action against any perceived invasion of their privacy, it is odd that this book, largely supportive of them, should be exempt from litigation.
Tax for over-40s
According to the Guardian, everyone over 40 will contribute towards the cost of care in later life, under plans being studied by ministers to end the crisis in social care.
It says they would have to pay more in tax or national insurance or insure themselves against hefty care bills when they are older.
The Times reports that Chancellor Rishi Sunak is considering a new tax on goods sold online amid mounting concern about the collapse of the High Street as Britain emerges from lockdown.
According to the paper, he is examining proposals for a tax to provide a source of revenue for the government and help bricks and mortar retailers to compete.
Finally, the Mail has a message for companies looking to boost their profits – put more women on your boards. It says a study has found that executive committees of FTSE companies whose make-up was more than a third women had a net profit margin of 15.2%, while those with none made just 1.5%.
According to the Telegraph, the report concludes that businesses which refuse to change the gender dynamic at the top, are creating an “almost hostile” environment for senior women.
It found that – in firms listed on the FTSE 350 index, chief executives called Peter outnumbered the 13 women leaders.