The AICC panel meeting was attended by Ambika Soni, Mukul Wasnik, Randeep Surjewala and KC Venugopal. The meeting reportedly discussed the party’s plan for submitting two crore signatures against the Centre’s contentious farms laws. The meeting also is learnt to have discussed the issue arising out of BJP attack on the Congress over the latter’s attitude towards Gupkar group of parties in the Kashmir valley. AICC in-charge of J&K, Rajni Patil, it is learnt, was also asked to give a briefing on discussions held and decisions taken by state leaders on the matter.
Amid indication there was a signal from the leadership, Congress Lok Sabha floor leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury criticised Sibal’s intentions and wondered why he didn’t he campaign for the party in Bihar, overlooking the fact that it is the AICC that decided who campaigned for each election. “After 2019, Rahul Gandhi stepped down following the bad result of Congress nationwide and now nobody can question the intention of Rahul or Sonia.
They stepped down and also offered that someone outside the Gandhi family should lead the party. In the current context, Sibal should stop giving sermons and come to the ground and work for the party” a statement circulated by Chowdhury’s office through his authorised WhatsApp group for media said. Another Gandhi loyalist Salman Khurshid told the media, “I don’t think we should discuss anything outside party fora. I don’t think we should be playing to people outside.
There’s serious work that has to be done. People like me have no worry about our future as we feel comfortable in our party.” Many Congress leaders, however, saw these as “command performance”, aimed at sending a signal to ‘loyalists’. Some leaders have pushed for issuing a public gag on comments on party matters and for bringing Sibal’s remarks under the scanner of the disciplinary committee but many others indicated there will be an avalanche of retaliation if any such a course is resorted to.